Legal Opinion

Orange Ice, Light & Water Co. v. Texas Compensation Ins.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 25, 1922No. 3762PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Texas; W. L. Estes, Judge. Action by the Texas Compensation Insurance Company against the Orange Ice, Eight & Water Company and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Circuit Judge.

The Texas Compensation Insurance Company, a corporation (hereinafter styled plaintiff), a citizen of Delaware, brought suit against the Orange Ice, Tight & Water Company (hereinafter styled Tight company) and Yellow .Pine Paper Mill Company (hereinafter styled paper mill), two corporations, each a citizen of Texas, as defendants, to recover for injuries inflicted on Jesse T. Dow-dell. and for his death, resulting therefrom, under the provisions of the Texas Workmen’s Compensation I,aw. Vernon’s Complete Texas Statute^, art. 5246, subsections 1-91, inclusive.

Dowdell was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Mobile & Montgomery Railway Co. v. JureySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Hess v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. New Orleans v. Gaines's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Mexican Central Railway Co. v. EckmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hayhurst v. HenryDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1951
  2. City of St. Paul v. SorensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  3. American Automobile Ins. Co. v. RyleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  4. Florinda Izazaga Cardenas v. California Forensic Medical Group, Inc., et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API