Legal Opinion
Florinda Izazaga Cardenas v. California Forensic Medical Group, Inc., et al.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 12, 2026No. 4:24-cv-04248Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FLORINDA IZAZAGA CARDENAS, Case No. 24-cv-04248-ASK 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 10 CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 87 11 Defendants. 12 13 Defendant California Forensic Medical Group, Inc. (“Defendant” or “CFMG”) has moved 14 the Court to dismiss with prejudice the Fourth Amended Complaint of Plaintiff Florinda Izazaga 15 Cardenas, Dkt. No. 83 (“FAC”), under the doctrine of res judicata and for failure to state a claim…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Wilhelm v. RotmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Mary Gordon v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Thinket Ink Information Resources, Inc. v. Sun Microsystems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Rickey Egberto v. Nevada Dep't. of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.