Legal Opinion
Chinook Indian Nation v. Zinke
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided June 20, 2018No. CASE NO. C17-5668 RBLPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiffs filed the present lawsuit in 2017.
II. LEGAL STANDARD
When considering a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) or 12(b)(6), the court construes the complaint in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. See Livid Holdings Ltd. v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. , 416 F.3d 940, 946 (9th Cir. 2005) ; see also Wolfe v. Strankman , 392 F.3d 358, 362 (9th Cir. 2004). Generally, the court must accept as true all well-pleaded allegations of material fact and draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff. See Wyler Summit P'ship v. Turner Broad. Sys.,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Doucette v. ZinkeDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- State of Washington v. United States Food and Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2023
- The Duwamish Tribe v. HaalandDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025