Legal Opinion

Di Iorio v. William H. Considine & Co.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 20, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRathbun, J.

This is a bill in equity to enjoin the respondents from selling complainant’s real estate on an execution which has been levied thereon. The cause is here on complainant’s appeal from a decree dismissing the bill.

The execution issued on a judgment obtained in a district court in an action of scire facias. The complainant contends that the district court had no jurisdiction to enter said judgment for the reason that the writ of scire facias was not served twenty days before the return-day thereof as required by statute. See Kevorko v. Vaitkunas, 54 R. I. 8 168 Atl. 910. No entry of appearance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grubb v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Di Iorio v. Wm. H. Considine Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1933
  3. Kevorko v. VaitkunasSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wholey v. Columbian National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1943
  2. Metts v. BB REALTY COMPANYSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API