Legal Opinion

Kevorko v. Vaitkunas

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided November 3, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRathbun, J.

This is an action of scire facias. The defendant filed a plea to the jurisdiction of the court, setting out that the writ was not served upon him twenty days before the return-day thereof as required by Section 7, Chapter 375, G. L. 1923. The case is here on plaintiff’s -exception to the action of the Superior Court denying his motion to strike out this plea and ordering the quashing of the writ.

Service of the writ was made by attaching defendant’s real estate twenty days before the return-day and by leaving with him an attested copy eighteen days before the return-day. Said section 7…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Michels v. StorkMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Di Iorio v. William H. Considine & Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1934
  2. Di Iorio v. Wm. H. Considine & Co.Superior Court of Rhode Island · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API