Cuyahoga County, Ohio, v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1ConcurrenceJones, Chief Judge
I would recommend that the plaintiff be paid the amount of the taxes up to April 22, 1942, the date when the defendant requisitioned the property, limited to the amount which was distributed to the wrong parties. In other words, I feel that plaintiff on the basis of equity should be paid $44,707.74 rather than half that amount as recommended by the majority.
The tax liens were fixed and of record when the Government requisitioned the property. Neither the county nor its officials were made a party to the requisition proceedings. The taxes were a first lien and constituted a direct interest in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. DunningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Ross v. GatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
- Palo v. RogersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Carpenter v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- State v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.