Legal Opinion

Pangle v. Joyce

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1996No. 95-1675PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

In O’Day v. Webb (1972), 29 Ohio St.2d 215, 58 O.O.2d 424, 280 N.E.2d 896, paragraph two of the syllabus, this court held that “[t]he fact that a question of law involves a consideration of facts or the evidence, does not turn it into a question of fact or raise a factual issue; nor does that consideration involve the court in weighing the evidence or passing upon its credibility.” With respect to questions of law, O’Day requires a court to consider both facts and evidence in reaching its legal determination and enjoins the court from weighing the evidence or passing on issues of credibility.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. O'Day v. WebbOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Tomlinson v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Satterthwaite v. MorganOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Erdman v. MestrovichOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Pallini v. DankowskiOhio Supreme Court · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gliner v. Saint-Gobain Norton Industrial Ceramics Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Catalanotto v. ByrdOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Mullins v. Comprehensive Pediatric, 07 Ma 144 (3-19-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Riedel v. Akron Gen. Health Sys., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
  5. Gliner v. Saint-Gobain Norton Indus. Ceramics Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API