Legal Opinion
Mann v. City of Tucson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 10, 1986No. 85-1847PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Per curiam
Mann, a pro se litigant, appeals from the dismissal of his action alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1982), as well as various pendent state causes of action, on the ground that the federal claims were barred by Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 101 S.Ct. 1908, 68 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981). We reverse.
Mann sued the City of Tucson, various members of the Tucson and Fort Lauder-dale Police Departments, and various private individuals for deprivation of property without due process, unreasonable search and seizure, and on various state causes of action (including conversion and defamation), all…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Wolfgang Arnold v. International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Industrial Tectonics, Inc. v. Aero Alloy, a California Corporation Die Cast Products, Inc., a California Corporation, AKA Metal Products GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Smith v. City of FontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Van Ort v. Estate of StanewichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- James F. Taylor v. MacE KnappCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Doe v. Virginia Department of State PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.