Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Carey, Lombard, Young & Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 25, 1934No. 22399PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, where the Carey, Lombard, Young & Company, a corporation, was plaintiff, and J. W. Holmes was defendant. The plaintiff declared on a promissory note for $200 executed by the defendant, past due and unpaid. The defendant admitted execution of the note and that it was unpaid, and for further answer alleged thatf the note was given as part payment for certain building material, to wit, stucco, purchased from the plaintiff to complete a certain dwelling housethat in said purchase the plaintiff guaranteed to the defendant that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ziska v. ZiskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Street's of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Howerton v. Callaway, Carey & Foster, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Wood & Co. v. State Ex Rel. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API