Legal Opinion

Howerton v. Callaway, Carey & Foster, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 17, 1935No. 23937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was commenced in the district court of Oklahoma county where Guss Howerton, plaintiff in error, filed suit against Callaway, Carey & Foster, Inc., a corporation, defendant in error, for the recovery of $3,500 paid on the purchase of real estate and for $1,000 loss in profits. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial below, where Guss Howerton was plaintiff and Callaway, Carey & Foster, Inc., a corporation, was defendant.

Plaintiff alleged in his petition that he had contracted to purchase certain real estate from defendant for the sum of $9,000; liad paid…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. San Diego Construction Co. v. MannixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Newcomb v. BrackettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
  3. Burks v. DaviesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Smith v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857
  5. Kreutzer v. LynchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kendall v. HastingsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. Anderson v. PickeringCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API