Legal Opinion

Friendship Villa-Clinton, Inc. v. Buck

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 31, 1981No. Civ. K-80-1850PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK A. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

In this case, Friendship Villa — Clinton, Inc. (Clinton) challenges, as violative of its rights under the federal and Maryland Constitutions, federal statutes and federal and Maryland regulations, certain federal and state regulations in accordance with which Maryland computes the reimbursable expenses of nursing homes under the Medicaid statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq. Because this Court concludes that plaintiff’s claims are barred by the Eleventh Amendment, it need not and does not reach the merits of any of those claims.

I. FACTS

The parties have stipulated…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Weide v. Mass Transit AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1985
  2. COLO. HEALTH CARE ASS'N v. Colo. Dept. of Soc. Serv.District Court, D. Colorado · 1984
  3. Olorado Health Care Ass'n v. Colorado Department of Social ServicesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1984
  4. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp. v. PeralesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  5. NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS v. PeralesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API