Legal Opinion

City of Cayce v. AT&T Communications of the Southern States, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 2, 1997No. 24626PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINNEY, Chief Justice:

We agreed to answer two questions certified by the United States Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals concerning the powers of a municipality vis-a-vis interstate telephone fiber optic cable installed within the municipality’s corporate limits. In essence, the certified questions ask whether franchise powers can be exercised in circumstances where the utility provides no direct services to the municipality or its residents, and whether a fee may be charged. We hold the respondent (Cayce) may not require appellant (AT & T) to enter a franchise agreement as a condition of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Village of Arlington HeightsIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. City of Abbeville v. Aiken Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Touchberry v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  4. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. v. Berkeley Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Condon v. Best View Cablevision, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. City of OrangeburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Quality Towing, Inc. v. City of Myrtle BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. v. Town of AwendawSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  4. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. v. Town of AwendawCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Quality Towing, Inc. v. City of Myrtle BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API