American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Village of Arlington Heights
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple
The question presented by this case is whether municipal governments can extort toll charges or franchise fees for the crossing of public ways. They cannot. The factual context of this case is that AT&T is laying an underground fiber optic cable along an 85-mile line in northern Illinois between Glenview and Rockford. The line is being laid along railroad right-of-way of the Chicago and North Western Transportation Company (CNW) pursuant to an easement granted by CNW. The cable is designed to carry only long distance telephone communications. Additionally, telecommunications traffic can enter…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Geneseo v. Illinois Northern Utilities Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1941
- People Ex Rel. Bernardi v. City of Highland ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Village of Lombard v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1950
- People ex rel. Shallberg v. Central Union Telephone Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Chicago General Railway Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- T & S SIGNS, INC. v. Village of WadsworthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Burns v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Burns v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Hawthorne v. Village of Olympia FieldsIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- Primeco Personal Communications, L.P. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.