Legal Opinion

State v. Campbell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 2011No. ED 95167PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY M. GAERTNER, Jr., Judge.

Introduction

The defendant, Keeton J. Campbell (Campbell), appeals his convictions after jury trial for statutory rape in the second degree. Campbell raises one point on appeal: the trial court erred and abused its discretion in admitting in rebuttal a high school photograph of the victim because the State of Missouri (State) failed to disclose the photograph in discovery and the photograph was not proper rebuttal evidence. We affirm.

Facts

As Campbell does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction, the relevant facts are as follows when…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  4. State v. BlackSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  5. United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State of Missouri v. Antoine L. ClarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. State v. Zetina-TorresMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. CHRISTOPHER WILLIS ENGLISHMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API