Legal Opinion

Corrao v. Mortier

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1959PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The question on this appeal is whether the applicant for a permit or license can recover damages in a mandamus proceeding against the mayor and members of a city council who illegally denied such application. There is no contention made that the defendants acted fraudulently or corruptly in refusing to grant the plaintiff’s application for a renewal of his taxicab permit. It is apparent from the record before us on the prior appeal that such refusal was the result of a mistaken interpretation by the defendants of the applicable city taxicab-licensing ordinance.

Sec. 293.04, Stats., provides…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gasque v. Town of ConwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  2. Paoli v. MasonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  3. Strahan v. FussellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  4. State ex rel. Bautz v. HarperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Tyrell v. BurkeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Scarpaci v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Ranous v. HughesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Allstate Insurance v. Metropolitan Sewerage Commission of County of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Eliason v. FunkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  5. State Ex Rel. Hodge v. Town of Turtle LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API