Legal Opinion

Salazar v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 17, 1909No. 4445PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant’s conviction was for rape, resulting in his- punishment being assessed at ten years confinement in the penitentiary.

Bill of exceptions No. 1, reserved to the action of the court refusing to continue the case will not be revised for the reason that the absent witnesses came into court and were tendered appellant during the trial. He refused or failed to place them on the witness stand.

Bill No. 2 recites that the district attorney was permitted to ask the witness Juaneta de Duque what was the appearance of the prosecutrix when witness saw her in the afternoon…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McDougal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Coffman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Witty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950
  5. Uhl v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API