Legal Opinion

Adams v. Bouchard

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided December 4, 2008No. CIV-07-979-DPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

TIMOTHY D. DeGIUSTI, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a state prisoner appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He contends that his constitutional rights were violated by Defendants. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), the matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Valerie K. Couch for initial proceedings. The Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment, to which Plaintiff responded.

Plaintiff contends that his constitutional rights were violated when Defendants Bouchard and Schmidt allegedly used unnecessary…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API