Adams v. Bouchard
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TIMOTHY D. DeGIUSTI, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a state prisoner appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He contends that his constitutional rights were violated by Defendants. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), the matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Valerie K. Couch for initial proceedings. The Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment, to which Plaintiff responded.
Plaintiff contends that his constitutional rights were violated when Defendants Bouchard and Schmidt allegedly used unnecessary…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.