Samoheyl v. Bearden
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Justice.
This is a guest statute case. The jury returned a verdict favoring appellant, but the trial court rendered judgment non ob-stante veredicto for the appellee.
The appellant contends that the trial court erred “in refusing to grant appellant’s motion for judgment on the verdict and in granting a judgment non obstante veredicto for the appellee Phipps because there was evidence raising a valid inference, that the appellee Phipps would receive, or could expect to receive at some time, a definite, tangible benefit, and because there was evidence raising a valid inference, that this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burt v. LochausenTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Air Conditioning Inc. v. Harrison - Wilson - PearsonTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Rowan v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Raub v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Dietrich v. FR Young CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fernandez v. KieslingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Fernandez v. KieslingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Ziad Elaazami v. Lawler Foods, Ltd, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012