Legal Opinion

Samoheyl v. Bearden

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 4, 1969No. 15554PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

This is a guest statute case. The jury returned a verdict favoring appellant, but the trial court rendered judgment non ob-stante veredicto for the appellee.

The appellant contends that the trial court erred “in refusing to grant appellant’s motion for judgment on the verdict and in granting a judgment non obstante veredicto for the appellee Phipps because there was evidence raising a valid inference, that the appellee Phipps would receive, or could expect to receive at some time, a definite, tangible benefit, and because there was evidence raising a valid inference, that this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Burt v. LochausenTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Air Conditioning Inc. v. Harrison - Wilson - PearsonTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Rowan v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Raub v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Dietrich v. FR Young CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fernandez v. KieslingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Fernandez v. KieslingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Ziad Elaazami v. Lawler Foods, Ltd, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API