Legal Opinion

United States v. Martin Gonzalez Curbelo

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 8, 1970No. 27282_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Curbelo, appealing from conviction of violating 26 U.S.C.A. § 174 under a single count charging sale of heroin, raises the constitutionality of the § 174 presumption of knowledge. This issue has been determined by Turner v. United States, 396 U.S. 398, 90 S.Ct. 642, 24 L.Ed.2d 610 (1970).

The material sold by appellant was represented by him to be heroin. An agent ran a Marquis Reagant test on a sample and reported to the buying agent that the results were positive, and the buyer then paid the appellant. Appellant contends that his motion for judgment of acquittal, made at the conclusion of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Zettie HaynesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. Bruce R. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. Claude Nolan HaroldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. Dale Edward SudduthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. Fernando MacIasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API