Legal Opinion
United States v. Lay
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 14, 2010No. 08-3892PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J., joined by Gibbons, J.,
KETHLEDGE, J. (pp. 449-50), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
*442OPINION
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Mark D. Lay appeals his fraud convictions related to a hedge fund investment by the Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation. Lay primarily argues that the jury instructions were improper and that insufficient evidence supports the jury’s verdict because, as a hedge fund adviser, Lay had a fiduciary relationship only with the hedge fund, not with its investors. Lay also seeks a new trial based on three of the district court’s evidentiary rulings and its…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. John R. Prince (98-6361), Tony White (98-6362)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Ralph M. Daniel, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Rachel Shannon Sosebee (03-1923) and Jack P. Farris (03-2219)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Linda Grubbs v. Sheakley Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Alki Partners, LP v. DB Fund Services, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- United States v. Gary MilbyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. MannionDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2011
- Goldenson v. SteffensDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.