Legal Opinion
United States v. Rachel Shannon Sosebee (03-1923) and Jack P. Farris (03-2219)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 12, 2005No. 03-1923, 03-2219PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judge.
The only issues raised in this sentencing appeal concern the district court’s calculation of the amount of loss suffered by the victims in this case and of the amount of restitution that the defendants have been ordered to pay. A related question, raised in response to the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in United States v. Booker after briefing was completed, concerns the applicability of the ruling in Booker to the imposition of an order of restitution.
The defendants, Rachel Shannon Sose-bee and Jack Farris, were originally charged with fraud and conspiracy to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- United States v. William Anthony Johnson (04-5110/6161) and Christopher L. Stone (04-5146)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Lionel Reifler, Glenn B. Laken, John M. Black, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. John F. Gardiner (05-1247) Ronald Lupo (05-1248)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. J. Richard JamiesonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Algis J. GaleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.