Meadows v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
West Virginia Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceDavis, Justice
(Filed June 9, 2000)
I firmly believe the legally correct decision was expressed in the majority opinion. I write separately only for the purpose of emphasizing the basis of my decision to vote with the majority.
Employees Have Legitimate Options for Obtaining Nonnested Fringe Benefits
The common thread running through these consolidated eases was the meaning that should be placed on the phrase “then accrued.” The majority opinion has correctly interpreted the phrase to mean “vested.” Put into proper context, the majority opinion held that fringe benefits under the West Virginia Wage Payment and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Barker v. ManchinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
- Sejman v. Warner-Lambert Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Tobin v. Ravenswood Aluminum Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Farley v. SpauldingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Singleton v. Kenya Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.