Legal Opinion
Edmo v. Idaho Dep't of Corr.
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided December 13, 2018No. Case No. 1:17-cv-00151-BLWPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
iv. A strong desire to be of the other gender.
v. A strong desire to be treated as the other gender.
vi. A strong conviction that one has the typical feelings and reactions of the other gender.
b. Second, the individual's condition must be associated with clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning. Exh. 1001 at 3-4.
3. "Clinically significant distress" means that the distress impairs or severely limits the person's ability to function in *1111a meaningful way and has reached a threshold that requires either medical or surgical…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Adree Edmo v. Corizon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Adree Edmo v. Corizon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Adree Edmo v. Corizon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Balsewicz, John v. Kallas, M.D., KevinDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2022
- Clark v. CookDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.