Legal Opinion

Perry v. Sulier

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1892PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to Monroe. (Kinne, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This is an action for malicious prosecution. Golden was acquitted by the direction of the court and Sulier by the jury.

Plaintiff, who was about 24 years of age, resided at Petersburgh. Sulier, a farmer, resided in Bedford. Golden, an attorney at law, resided in the city of Monroe. He had practiced his profession there for 15 years, had been prosecuting attorney for 4 years, city attorney 7 years, and mayor of the city 1 year. Plaintiff was slightly known to Sulier, but was not at all known to Golden. Benjamin Sulier, the father of defendant Sulier, claimed that some money had been stolen from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Huntington v. GaultMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Carson v. EdgeworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Schneider v. ShepherdMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. State v. ShawSupreme Court of Vermont · 1901
  3. Diers v. MallonNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Ton v. StetsonWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. LeClear v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API