C. P. Wright Construction Co. v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Rogers,
C. P. Wright Construction Company (Wright) has appealed a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board affirming the referee’s decision that Matthew and Kelli Smith, minors, are entitled to continued compensation benefits under Section 307 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §562. We vacate the Board’s order and remand the record to the Board for a recomputation of benefits to be paid on behalf of Matthew, Kelli and a third child, Staci Lynn Smith.
Matthew and Kelli, whose deceased father, Gary Leon…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mohan v. Publicker Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Landis v. Zimmerman Motors, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Lehigh Foundations, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Decker v. Mohawk Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ramich v. Worker's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Penczkowski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Cooper-Jarrett, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Ramich Ex Rel. Ramich v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Ramich Ex Rel. Ramich v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999