Legal Opinion

Smith v. Borden

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the district court for Harlan county. Tried below before Gaslin, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Ch. J.

In April, 1885, the plaintiff filed his bill of particulars before one Henry Wilcox, a justice of the peace for Harlan county, claiming from defendant the sum of $12.90, with interest from October 13, 1884, for goods sold and delivered to said defendant by David Brothers & Co., which account was assigned to plaintiff. The cause coming on for trial on the 27th day of April, the parties appeared by their respective attorneys, and the case was continued by consent to the 27th day of May. On that day, defendant failing to appear and plaintiff appearing by his attorney, judgment by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clendenning v. Crawford & McLaughlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Roberts v. SwearingenNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Cleghorn v. WatermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Bemis v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Crippen v. ChurchNebraska Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beard v. RingerNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Carr v. LuscherNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Crumay v. HenryNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Johnson v. Johnston-Coutant Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API