Legal Opinion

Cleghorn v. Waterman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1884PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to the district court for Cass county. Tried below before Pound, J,

1Opinion of the Court

Cobb, Cfl. J.

This action was originally commenced by Waterman before a justice of the peace. Upon the return day of the summons the defendant Cleghorn, upon his motion and showing, obtained a continuance for twenty-eight- days, or from the 13th day of February, 1883, to the 13th day of March following, at 10 o’clock, A.M., the plaintiff’s petition or bill of particulars having been filed in the case at the time of commencing the suit. On the adjourned day at 10 o’clock, the defendant by his attorney appeared and filed his defense consisting of a .general denial, and it is claimed that said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Porter v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Clendenning v. Crawford & McLaughlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Coffman v. BrandhoefferNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. JosephNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Brown v. RiceNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Carr v. LuscherNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Crippen v. ChurchNebraska Supreme Court · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API