Legal Opinion

Robert E. McDonough v. Whalen

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 4, 1973PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

These actions of tort, which were tried together to a jury, were brought by McDonough and his wife to recover damages resulting from the defective operation of a septic system on premises they had purchased in North Attleborough. There were two counts against the defendant Whalen for negligent design of the septic system; two against Whalen for negligent inspection and approval of the system in his capacity as agent of the North Attleborough board of health; and, in the action against the defendant DesVergnes, two counts for negligence in the installation of the system. In each instance, the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Spade v. Lynn & Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  3. George v. Jordan Marsh CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. Craig v. Everett M. Brooks Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  5. Gildea v. EllershawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McDonough v. WhalenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Marcil v. John Deere Industrial Equipment Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  3. Spring Motors Distributors v. Ford Motor Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  4. Meridian at Windchime, Inc. v. Earth Tech, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
  5. Gateway Condominium Trust v. ClintonMassachusetts Superior Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API