Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Billington v. Sinclair

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1947No. 30154Published

1DissentMillard, J.

(dissenting)—I agree with counsel for appellants that the ordinance proposed is invalid, in view of the fact that it would require abandonment by the city of Vancouver of the commission form of government prior to the expiration of six years from the date of adoption of that form of government. That this is violative of the statute (Rem. Rev. Stat., § 9112) is patent. The obvious purpose of the six-year limitation is to prevent rapid and recurrent fluctuations in the governmental organization of cities. In State ex rel. Alexander v. Evanson, 64 N. D. 603, 255 N. W. 98, it is observed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re ClohertyWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. State ex rel. City of Seattle v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Martin v. TollefsonWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. State ex rel. Fawcett v. Superior Court of Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. State ex rel. Snell v. WarnerWashington Supreme Court · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API