Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Snell v. Warner

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1892No. 670PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J. —

The nominal cause of action in this case is that the respondent is usurping the right to sit as a conn*774oilman from the sixth ward of the city of Tacoma; but the real matter in issue is the question whether or not the territory included within the sixth ward is legally a portion of that city. Since the 25th day of October, 1890, the city of Tacoma has been acting under a municipal charter adopted in pursuance of art. 11, § 10 of the constitution. In April, 1891, in pursuance of § 9 of the act of March 27, 1890 (the general municipal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Westport v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. People ex rel. Adams v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Hannibal v. WinchesterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. State Ex Rel. Bowen v. KruegelWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Hase v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Kuhn v. City of Port TownsendWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  5. State ex rel. Everett Fire Fighters, Local No. 350 v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API