Legal Opinion

People v. Oliver

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1958PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The order of the Appellate Division granting a new trial is correct. The indictment, being in the long form, is defective insofar as it charges burglary in the first degree by omitting the essential allegation that it occurred in the nighttime (Penal Law, § 402, subd. 4), and, being in the long form, it could not be amended nor the deficiency supplied by a bill of particulars or ignored (People v. Ercole, 308 N. Y. 425). Nevertheless the indictment is not to be dismissed inasmuch as even if the offense were committed in the daytime it would be burglary in the second degree (Penal Law, § 403).…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  2. People v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. People v. ErcoleNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. People v. ValentineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  5. People v. . ValentineNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. MackeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. People v. PerezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. People v. SkinnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API