Legal Opinion

People v. Hooker

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 2, 1954No. Crim. 967PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Separate grand jury indictments were returned against defendants and appellants Lowell Dwayne Hooker, Jack Lee Thompson and Jack Leimas, charging in count one that each conspired with the other named appellants and defendant Richard Earl Burson to steal a Lincoln automobile. In a second count each was charged with grand theft of the same car. Pleas of not guilty were entered and by stipulation the actions were consolidated for the purposes of trial. A jury was waived. Appellants did not testify at the trial. Judgment of not guilty was rendered on the first count, and guilty on the second…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. People v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. GallardoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. People v. CloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SamaniegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. People v. HartridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Smith v. Mitchell P.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Smith v. Mitchell P.California Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API