Legal Opinion

People v. Thornton

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 26, 1997No. 2-96-0143PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doyle

Defendant, Charles Thornton, was convicted of cruelty to an animal in violation of section 3.01 of the Humane Care For Animals Act (Act) (510 ILCS 70/3.01 (West 1994)). The trial court imposed a sentence that included, inter alia: 10 days of incarceration; 2 years of probation; 200 hours of community service; and restitution totalling $3,571.83.

Defendant filed a timely appeal. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court erred when it (1) denied his motion to suppress evidence that was seized in a warrantless search of his residence; (2) required him to pay restitution; and (3) imposed…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. People v. IllgenIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. FreeIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. FernIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Davis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State v. StoneMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. GrecoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. Morgan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API