Legal Opinion
Michael Branden Whetsell v. Kevin Alexander Murnock & PFC Martinez
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided May 21, 2026No. 2:24-cv-05487Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Michael Branden Whetsell, ) C/A No. 2:24-cv-05487-BHH-MHC ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ) Kevin Alexander Murnock & PFC Martinez, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Plaintiff Michael Branden Whetsell (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed this action alleging violations of his constitutional rights. ECF No. 1. Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Kevin Alexander Murnock and PFC Martinez. ECF No. 89. Because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the Court issued an order pursuant to Roseboro v. Garrison,
528…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.