Legal Opinion

Bishop v. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental & Reinforcing Iron Workers

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 1, 2004No. CIV.A.03-344 GKPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KESSLER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, Carl E. Bishop and Oscar Ingram, members of Atlanta Local 387 (“Local”), bring suit against the International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers (“International”), which controls the Local under a trusteeship. Plaintiffs allege that certain provisions of the International’s constitution violate their rights to free speech and to sue under Title I of the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (“LMRDA”), 29 U.S.C. § 411, et seq.. They also allege that the International’s disciplinary…

2Cases cited19 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Hudson v. Am. Fed'n of Gov't Emps.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017