Borochoff Properties, Inc. v. Howard Lumber Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
While the appellant filed what he denominated as a motion for judgment “notwithstanding the judgment,” we find no authority for such a motion. Moreover, if this be construed as the equivalent of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, the rule is well settled that such a motion is not permissible when a judge presides without the intervention of a jury. Smith v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 98 Ga. App. 840 (107 SE2d 334); Wood v. Sheppard, 100 Ga. App. 376, 378 (111 SE2d 242). Hence, in considering the appeal we treat the enumerations of error only with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Allen v. KesslerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Burke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Hinchcliffe v. PinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Nellwood Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Sapp v. HoweCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Whisenhunt v. Allen Parker Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Floyd v. Colonial Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Fulton v. Anchor Savings Bank, FSBCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Benn v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Carter v. TatumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.