Legal Opinion

Borochoff Properties, Inc. v. Howard Lumber Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 11, 1967No. 42607, 42608PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Judge.

While the appellant filed what he denominated as a motion for judgment “notwithstanding the judgment,” we find no authority for such a motion. Moreover, if this be construed as the equivalent of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, the rule is well settled that such a motion is not permissible when a judge presides without the intervention of a jury. Smith v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 98 Ga. App. 840 (107 SE2d 334); Wood v. Sheppard, 100 Ga. App. 376, 378 (111 SE2d 242). Hence, in considering the appeal we treat the enumerations of error only with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Allen v. KesslerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Burke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  3. Hinchcliffe v. PinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Nellwood Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Sapp v. HoweCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Whisenhunt v. Allen Parker Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Floyd v. Colonial Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  3. Fulton v. Anchor Savings Bank, FSBCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Benn v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. Carter v. TatumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API