United States v. John L. Carroll
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LIVELY, Circuit Judge.
The defendant who is a physician appeals from a jury conviction on six of ten counts for distribution of Seconal, a Schedule III controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 812 and § 841(a)(1). It is claimed that four separate errors occurred at the trial which require reversal of his conviction.
*188The first claim of error is that the prosecution failed to prove that Seconal (sodium secobarbital) is a controlled substance, the distribution of which is prohibited by 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). It is provided in Section 812(c), Schedule III, Part (b)(1), that “[a]ny…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Russell W. White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Henry M. Collier, Jr., M. D.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Charles Robert HeadCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Richard Scott McLernon Kido Yaqui, Sherri Louise Farrell, Miguel Angel Carranza, and Marco Antonio Valdez-CotaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Jessie BuchananCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. HurwitzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Richard Seelig, Terry Hawkins, and Donald PrimmerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.