Legal Opinion
Bryan v. Makosky
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 7, 2004No. 76PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilner, J.
This action tests whether Linda Makosky or William Bryan is the duly appointed member of the Talbot County Planning and Zoning Commission. Acting on Ms. Makosky’s complaint and Mr. Bryan’s counterclaim for declaratory and injunctive relief, the Circuit Court for Talbot County entered a declaratory judgment that Mr. Bryan’s appointment on November 26, 2002, was illegal, null, and void, and that Ms. Makosky, an incumbent Commissioner at that time, continued in office as a member of the Commission. Although we do not agree with some of the underlying conclusions of the court, we agree with that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Eberle v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Boyd v. HuntingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- People v. DethloffNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- People ex rel. Sweet v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Talmadge v. CordellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Murphy v. PearsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Maryland Attorney General Opinion 106OAG067, Maryland Attorney General Reports2021
- Public Officers and EmployeesEducation – A State Superintendent of Schools Who is Appointed to a Vacancy in the Middle of a Term Serves for the Remainder of the Unexpired Term., Maryland Attorney General Reports2021
- Public Officers and EmployeesEducation – A State Superintendent of Schools Who is Appointed to a Vacancy in the Middle of a Term Serves for the Remainder of the Unexpired Term., Maryland Attorney General Reports2021