Legal Opinion

Dimmer v. Spearman

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 29, 1937No. 5518PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

The widow and heirs of Gus Gipson, deceased, bring this action to have canceled and annulled, because of alleged error of fact and law on their part, sales made-by them in the year 1919 to N. S. and W. R. Spearman of undivided interests in and to the “S.W.% of Section 15, Township 23, Range 16 West, and 51% acres in Section 22, same Township and Range described in their petition, and situated in Caddo Parish, Louisiana.”

One sale conveys an undivided two-fifths interest in said tracts, and the other conveys a one-tpnth interest therein.

It was the intention of the grantors,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. HunterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858
  2. Jefferson Sawmill Co. v. Iowa & Louisiana Land Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  3. Wilberding v. MaherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  4. Palfrey v. StinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1837

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. United Gas Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  2. Wood v. CunninghamNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Ace Realty, Inc. v. LooneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  4. Jackson v. United Gas Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API