Legal Opinion

Bell v. Moody

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 30, 1941No. 11106PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CODY, Justice.

This is a suit by appellee against appellant for the unpaid balance on appellant’s note after there had been credited thereon the proceeds realized from a trustee’s foreclosure sale of certain real estate. Appellant’s defense was a plea of estoppel; that appellee, acting through J. B. Mills, who had either express, implied or apparent authority, agreed that if appellant would not attend the foreclosure sale, no deficiency judgment would be taken against him on the note, etc. Appellee filed a sworn denial of authority in J. B. Mills to make the alleged agreement. A detailed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bank of United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Continental Oil Co. v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Potts v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Nelson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. St. Paul Surplus Lines Ins. Co., Inc. v. Dal-Worth Tank, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1996
  2. Lone Star Gas Co. v. ChildressCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  3. Flynn v. Michigan-Wisconsin Pipeline CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  4. Bankers Protective Life Ins. Co. v. AddisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Bolin v. Pacific Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API