Legal Opinion

Ruthrauff v. Silver King Western Min. & Mill. Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1938No. 5927PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSON, Justice.

This is an action by plaintiffs above named against all the defendants to quiet their title to an undivided one-fourth interest in the Augusta Lode Mining Claim, U. S. Lot No. 122, situate in Big Cottonwood and Uintah Mining Districts in Salt Lake and Summit counties. The defendant corporation will be referred to herein as the Silver King, and the remaining defendants in a group as “Anderson, et al.”

The Silver King answered separately and counterclaimed to quiet its claim of title to the entire mining claim. The defendants Anderson et al. answered and counterclaimed for…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Speidel v. HenriciSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Patterson v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Sullivan v. Portland & Kennebec RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Felix v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Godden v. KimmellSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Adamson Et Ux. v. BrockbankUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Kay Hunt v. Vernon J. Pick, Andrew Hunt v. Vernon J. PickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  3. Auerbach v. SamuelsUtah Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Karl Horn and Lois Horn v. Robert B. Daniel and Le Roy BaconCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  5. Meagher v. Uintah Gas Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API