Oceana, Inc. v. Pritzker
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
Re Document Nos.: 36, 37, 38
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying Plaintiff’s .Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting Federal Defen- • dants’ Motion for Summary Judgment; and Granting Intervenor-Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Oceana, Inc. (“Oceana”) has filed this suit against Defendants Penny Pritzker, in her official capacity as Secretary of Commerce, 1 the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”), and the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) (collectively, “Federal Defendants”). Oceana alleges that the…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Anglers Conservation Network v. Penny PritzkerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Anglers Conservation Network v. PritzkerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Anglers Conservation Network v. PritzkerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Permian Basin Petroleum Ass'n v. Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2015
- Defenders of Wildlife v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.