Legal Opinion

Anglers Conservation Network v. Penny Pritzker

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 5, 2016No. 14-5304PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.

RANDOLPH, Senior Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs brought this lawsuit claiming that federal agencies unlawfully neglected to manage stocks of river herring (alewives and blueback herring), and shad (American shad and their smaller relatives, hickory shad) in the Atlantic Ocean from New York to North Carolina.

These are schooling ocean fish. In early spring, as waters warm, river herring and shad begin their annual spawning runs into the mid-Atlantic coastal rivers and tributaries. 1 Shad, especially American shad, and more specifically the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Franklin v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Elec. Privacy Info. Ctr. v. Internal Revenue Serv.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Connecticut v. U.S. Dep't of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. Public Citizen, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  4. Tawanda Jones v. David Dufek, Sr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  5. Center for Biological Diversity v. ZinkeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API