Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Belknap v. Lavelle

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1985No. 84-357PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

For a writ of mandamus to issue in this case, we must find that relators-appellants have a clear legal right to the relief they seek, that the respondents-appellees are under a clear legal duty to perform the requested act, and that relators-appellants have no plain and adequate remedy at law. State, ex rel. Hanley, v. Roberts (1985), 17 Ohio St. 3d 1, 8.

The analysis with respect to the question of jurisdiction in this case is made difficult because it is necessarily tied to the ultimate merit question. R.C. 124.03(A) confers upon the State Personnel Board of Review the *181responsibility to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Canton v. Imperial Bowling Lanes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State ex rel. Hanley v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. SavordOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Schisler v. ClausingOhio Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. YarbroughOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Akron-Canton Waste Oil, Inc. v. Safety-Kleen Oil Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Roberts v. RMB Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Whiston v. Bio-Lab, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Burdge v. Kerasotes Showplace Theatres, Unpublished Decision (9-5-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API