Legal Opinion

Frances L. Dalm v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 8, 1989No. 88-1079PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVELY, Senior Circuit Judge.

The doctrine of equitable recoupment holds that when a single transaction or taxable event has been subjected to two taxes on inconsistent legal theories, a taxpayer who meets certain requirements may recover a refund that would be barred otherwise by limitations. Rothensies v. Electric Storage Battery Co., 329 U.S. 296, 299-300, 67 S.Ct. 271, 272-273, 91 L.Ed. 296 (1946). In the present case the district court granted the government’s motions to dismiss the complaint and for summary judgment upon concluding that the taxpayer was not entitled to a refund of gift…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Stone v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Rothensies v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. McEachern v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Michael G. O'Brien v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Estate of Mueller v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1993
  3. Eldon Fairley, of the Estate of Julian R. Fairley, Deceased, and of Estate of Frances B. Fairley, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  4. Estate of Bessie I. Mueller, John S. Mueller, Personal Representative v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1996
  5. Estate of Mueller v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API