Legal Opinion

Murphy v. E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1985No. L.A. 31970PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*675Opinion

MOSK, J.

We consider issues relating to the liability of a manufacturer and a pharmacy for the production and sale of an allegedly defective drug, stilbestrol (DES). We will decide whether a pharmacy at which the drug was purchased may be held strictly liable for alleged defects in the product (as distinguished from ordinary negligence), and whether a manufacturer which sold 10 percent of DES nationwide may be found to have had a “substantial” share of the market for the purpose of applying the “market share” doctrine enunciated in Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories (1980) 26 Cal.3d 588…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Jimenez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Walton v. Bayer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Conte v. Wyeth, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API