Legal Opinion

Breitman v. General Motors Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 6, 1971PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The court erred in granting its own motion, after submission of the case, conforming the pleading to the proof, amending plaintiff’s cause of action from breach of warranty to negligence. Such amendment prejudiced the defendants in that they were prevented from meeting the new issues subsequently raised by the amendment (Berkenstat v. Oliver, 275 App. Div. 679; Schneiderman v. Mother’s Friend’s Wet Wash Laundry, 230 App. Div. 197; Household Coal & Oil Distrs. v. Sage, 57 Misc 2d 428; Canham v. Canham, 4 Misc 2d 538; see 3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., p. 30-473) and were thereby…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schneiderman v. Mother's Friend's Wet Wash Laundry, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  2. Frantz v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  3. Household Coal & Oil Distributors, Inc. v. SageCivil Court of the City of New York · 1968
  4. Canham v. CanhamNew York Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trustees of Columbia University v. BruncatiAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API