Legal Opinion

Gallenstein v. Testa

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 2014No. 2012-1971Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Gallenstein v. Testa, 138 Ohio St.3d 240,

2014-Ohio-98.] GALLENSTEIN, APPELLANT, v. TESTA, TAX COMMR., APPELLEE. [Cite as Gallenstein v. Testa, 138 Ohio St.3d 240,

2014-Ohio-98.] R.C. 5741.02(C)(4)—Boat owner qualified for transient-use exception to use tax—BTA acted unreasonably and unlawfully in affirming tax commissioner’s assessment of use tax. (No. 2012-1971—Submitted October 8, 2014—Decided January 22, 2014.) APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2008-A-1340. ____________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} Cheryl Gallenstein appeals from a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Satullo v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. American National Can Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Canton Malleable Iron Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Campus Bus Service v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Cincinnati City School District Board of Education v. State Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API