Legal Opinion

In Re the Personal Restraint of Lundeen

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 12, 1978No. 2630-3PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMunson, C.J.

Malcom G. Lundeen seeks relief from personal restraint imposed by a conviction for the crime of obtaining money from a restaurant with intent to defraud (RCW 19.48.110) entered upon a plea of guilty. Mr. Lun-deen contends his guilty plea was not intelligently and voluntarily made with knowledge of the consequences. We vacate the plea and remand for further proceedings.

Mr. Lundeen alleges three grounds for. the relief sought:

1. His trial attorney told him before he went to court that his maximum sentence would be 5 years. The court, however, when accepting the plea did not tell him about a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Wood v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. In Re the Personal Restraint of VenselWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. DurhamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  2. In Re the Personal Restraint of TaylorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  3. In Re the Personal Restraint of TeemsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  4. In Re the Welfare of BryanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  5. In Re the Personal Restraint of TaylorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API