Diversified Technologies Corp. v. Jerome Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Diversified Technologies Corporation (“Ditco”) has sued Jerome Technologies, Inc. (“Jerome”) for breach of contract: Jerome allegedly failed to pay Ditco for services rendered toward the “Project”—the proposed development of a new type of lid for beverage cans, the “AM-TAB Easy Open Beverage End” (the “AM-TAB”). Ditco’s one-count complaint sought a de*447claratory judgment that (1) its agreements with Jerome were terminated and (2) Diversified “is vested with the entire right, title and interest in and to the Project____” On Jerome’s motion this…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Roland MacHinery Company v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. Canteen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re MauriceUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994