Legal Opinion

Diversified Technologies Corp. v. Jerome Technologies, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 28, 1988No. 87 C 6128PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

Diversified Technologies Corporation (“Ditco”) has sued Jerome Technologies, Inc. (“Jerome”) for breach of contract: Jerome allegedly failed to pay Ditco for services rendered toward the “Project”—the proposed development of a new type of lid for beverage cans, the “AM-TAB Easy Open Beverage End” (the “AM-TAB”). Ditco’s one-count complaint sought a de*447claratory judgment that (1) its agreements with Jerome were terminated and (2) Diversified “is vested with the entire right, title and interest in and to the Project____” On Jerome’s motion this…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Roland MacHinery Company v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. Canteen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  5. Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re MauriceUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API